> My fundamental disagreement is that I don't care about what an obviously biased guy has to say about the media
That's not disagreement, that's just covering your ears and going la la la. You're barking up the wrong tree, that book is a good primer for you to find out how, if you don't read it you're still barking up the wrong tree.
No, it's just you're talking to yourself. You are not interacting with the points raised by the person you reply to, you just twist them into a straw man to beat down on. Which is fine, but doesn't require the presence of anyone but you.
> I assert that the Hollywood system creates movies like this because because of the way it is structured and the nature of making movies.
You respond to that with
> I get that you're trying to pull the popular claim these days about things being "systemic"
And go on to talk to yourself some more. You just aren't equipped to even read that comment, much less that book and others exploring the same issues.
"Everybody who disagrees with me is a conspiracy theorist, even if they explicit say there is no conspiracy. Also they're biased but of course I'm not."
That's not disagreement, that's just covering your ears and going la la la. You're barking up the wrong tree, that book is a good primer for you to find out how, if you don't read it you're still barking up the wrong tree.