That is exactly why I used an actual parser not some glorified regex. Thank for you rebutting their ridicilous remark. I even literally said in their quote.
Why anyone would think a glorified regex is a solution to updating deeply nested HTML elements is beyond me, is the famous "HTML regex"[1] answer not enough? As bad a sugesting Chrome should just be a wrapper for sed/awk.
Why anyone would think a glorified regex is a solution to updating deeply nested HTML elements is beyond me, is the famous "HTML regex"[1] answer not enough? As bad a sugesting Chrome should just be a wrapper for sed/awk.
[1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open...